Publications and media

• Wethal, Ulrikke Bryn; Ellsworth-Krebs, Katherine; Hansen, Arve; Changede, Sejal & Spaargaren, Gert (2022). Reworking boundaries in the home-as-office: boundary traffic during COVID-19 lockdown and the future of working from home. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy. ISSN 1548-7733. doi: 10.1080/15487733.2022.2063097. Show summary

  The COVID-19 crisis has led to an unprecedented acceleration in the number of people working from home (WFH). This article applies a practice theoretical lens to expand the pre-pandemic telework literature which often overlooks how WFH is part of complex socio-material arrangements. Based on 56 household interviews in the UK, the United States, and Norway during lockdown in Spring 2020, we reveal the everyday realities of WFH, exploring their implications for the future of work. Developing the concept of boundary traffic, which refers to the additional interaction and collision of a range of everyday practices normally separated in time and space when working outside the home, we provide some insights into how disruption and de- and re-routinization vary by household type, space, and employer’s actions. Much teleworking scholarship highlights technological and spatial flexibility of work, without recognizing the mundane realities of WFH when there is no space for a large computer monitor, preferences to be with children even when a secluded home office is available, or a feeling that important social connections diminish when working on a virtual basis. We discuss the future of work in relation to digitalization, social inequality, and environmental sustainability and conclude by stressing how WFH cannot be understood as merely a technical solution to work-life flexibility. Rather, lockdown-induced WFH has deeply changed the meaning and content of homes as households have resolved the spatial, material, social, and temporal aspects of boundary traffic when embedding work into the domestic practice-bundle.

• Skjærseth, Jon Birger & Rosendal, G. Kristin (2022). Implementing the EU Renewable Energy Directive in Norway: from Tailwind to Headwind. Environmental Politics. ISSN 0964-4016. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2022.2075153.
• Andersen, Mikael Skou; Christensen, Lotte; Donner-Amnell, Jakob; Eikeland, Per Ove; Hedeler, Barbara & Hildingsson, Roger [Show all 17 contributors for this article] (2022). To facilitate a fair bioeconomy transition, stronger regional-level linkages are needed. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining. ISSN 1932-104X. doi: 10.1002/bbb.2363.
• Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson & Bailey, Ian (2022). Anchoring Policies, Alignment Tensions: Reconciling New Zealand’s Climate Change Act and Emissions Trading Scheme. Politics and Governance. ISSN 2183-2463. 10(1). doi: 10.17645/pag.v10i1.4788. Show summary

  Climate Change Acts (CCAs) seek to anchor national climate policy by establishing long‐term targets and lines of accountability that guide the development of other climate policy instruments. However, counter‐pressures to modify CCAs can occur where tensions exist with the provisions of already‐established policies that enjoy substantial political and stakeholder support. Such tensions can be especially pronounced where CCAs necessitate major changes to emissions trading schemes (ETSs) that have formed the mainstay of efforts to reduce national emissions. This article employs a novel anchoring policy framework to examine the dynamics of aligning ETSs with CCAs. We investigate debates on reforms to the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme following the introduction of the Zero Carbon Act in 2019 to examine how alignment pressures between anchoring and subordinate policies are negotiated. The analysis reveals several tactics used to increase the acceptability of reforms to the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme and protect the Zero Carbon Act’s integrity. The article concludes by arguing that a greater understanding of alignment pressures between anchoring and subordinate policies is essential in enabling both CCAs and ETSs to contribute to achieving decarbonisation goals.

• Moynat, Orlane; Volden, Johannes & Sahakian, Marlyne (2022). How do COVID-19 lockdown practices relate to sustainable well-being? Lessons from Oslo and Geneva. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy. ISSN 1548-7733. 18(1), p. 309–324. doi: 10.1080/15487733.2022.2051350. Show summary

  The COVID-19 pandemic has led to changes in everyday lives through restrictions that resulted in lockdown practices in the home, whereby practices were reassessed, changed, renewed, or newly established. Based on a qualitative study of lockdown practices following the first wave of the pandemic in two European cities with high living standards, Oslo and Geneva, we studied how changes in practices led to need (non)satisfaction and (un)sustainable consumption, demonstrating the significance of social interactions in how practices were coordinated. We then highlight the practice elements that favored or impeded need satisfaction, recognizing what material arrangements, skills, and competencies were necessary. Finally, we discuss the “normative accountability” of lockdown practices in discourse, in that the mutual accountability of various practices during the lockdown revealed the need for coordination between people sharing the same space. We find that social interactions are critical toward understanding how the lockdown practices were coordinated in given space-time configurations. Need satisfaction required grappling with social differentiation, as people with strong social relations, generous indoor spaces, and access to outdoor natural environments experienced higher levels of well-being. This situation has implications for policy making in terms of how societies can be reorganized to ensure “sustainable well-being” as a normative aim.

• Aarsæther, Nils & Westskog, Hege (2022). Transforming Arctic municipalities: The winding road to low-emission communities. In Sørly, Rita; Kårtveit, Bård & Ghaye, Tony (Ed.), Stories of Change and Sustainability in the Arctic Regions The Interdependence of Local and Global. Routledge. ISSN 978-0-367-63284-7.
• Greene, Mary; Hansen, Arve; Hoolohan, Claire; Süßbauer, Elisabeth & Domaneschi, Lorenzo (2022). Consumption and shifting temporalities of daily life in times of disruption: undoing and reassembling household practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy. ISSN 1548-7733. doi: 10.1080/15487733.2022.2037903.
• Standal, Karina & Westskog, Hege (2022). Understanding low-carbon food consumption transformation through social practice theory: The case of community supported agriculture in Norway. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food. ISSN 0798-1759. 28(1), p. 7–23. doi: 10.48416/ijsaf.v28i1.452. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Drawing on a qualitative case study of consumers involved in community-supported agriculture farms in Norway, this article applies social practice theory to understand pro-environmental behaviour transformation in relation to community-supported agriculture. Situating social practice theory in the larger framework of the political economy of low-carbon transformation provides a holistic and grounded perspective on consumer behaviour change and potential for social transformation. In contrast to conventional individualistic and rationalist approaches, our study suggests that there is no linear path of transformation; rather, people join community-supported agriculture to use their consumer power to push for social transformation. Simultaneously, community-supported agriculture influences a reorientation of values and practices because it opens up opportunities and resources for sustainable lifestyles. We argue that the collaborative aspects of community-supported agriculture can challenge unsustainable consumption by emphasising sharing over private ownership and frugality over accumulation of growth. However, the consumer practices of the wider political economy produced by the ‘culture of capitalism’ continue to be ingrained in people’s social relations and contexts, and thus weaken new and more sustainable forms of food consumption.

• Volden, Johannes & Hansen, Arve (2022). Practical aeromobilities: making sense of environmentalist air-travel . Mobilities. ISSN 1745-0101. doi: 10.1080/17450101.2021.1985381. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Flying has become an increasingly contested form of consumption, but ‘green’ consumers often continue to fly. This paper provides novel insights into the stubbornness of air-travel by specifically studying the obstacles that environmentally conscious consumers face when trying to limit or eliminate aeromobility. Through in-depth interviews with Norwegian environmental organization workers – conceptualised as particularly self-reflexive when it comes to environmentally contested forms of consumption – we analyse how environmentalists negotiate one of the most environmentally destructive aspects of their consumption patterns. To explore how the social embeddedness of flying complicates the reduction of air-travel in these accounts, we draw on a combination of mobilities and social practice approaches. The participants considered flying to be problematic, but also often necessary in specific practices. Various expectations related to convenience, time, and sociality, led to a certain ‘lock-in’ of (aero)mobility. Zooming out to consider broader practice geographies, we argue that aeromobility contributes to the tempo-spatial expansion of many practices, changing their contents, meanings, and the contexts in which they unfold. To achieve sustainable mobility, we suggest that attention must be shifted from the air-travels of individual consumers to the broader practices in which aeromobility is embedded.

• Christiansen, Petter; Stokstad, Sigrid; Tønnesen, Anders & Westskog, Hege (2021). Hvordan har rettferdighetsspørsmål blitt behandlet i byvekstavtalene? Plan: Tidsskrift for samfunnsplanlegging, byplan og regional utvikling. ISSN 0805-083X. p. 48–55.
• Böcker, Lars; Røe, Per Gunnar & Oftedal, Elling (2021). Urban regional planning under the pandemic – the case of Oslo. In Filion, Pierre; Doucet, Brian & van Melik, Rianne (Ed.), Global Reflections on COVID-19 and Urban Inequalities, Volume 4: Policy and Planning. Bristol University Press. ISSN 9781529219043. p. 189–200.
• West, Jennifer Joy; Amundsen, Helene; Schaller, Nathalie & Aasen, Marianne (2021). Climate Change: Foundations for a transformative learning agenda. In Sæverot, Herner (Eds.), Meeting the Challenges of Existential Threats through Educational Innovation: A Proposal for an Expanded Curriculum . Routledge. ISSN 9780367894856.
• Hjorteset, Mari Andrine; Böcker, Lars; Røe, Per Gunnar & Wessel, Terje (2021). Intraurban geographies of car sharing supply and demand in Greater Oslo, Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. ISSN 1361-9209. 101, p. 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103089. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  This paper examines urban patterns of car sharing supply and demand at neighbourhood level. By using literature on spatial inequality and unequal mobility access, we provide new insights into the urban geographies of car sharing. We draw on register data of members and vehicles of station-based car sharing for Oslo, Norway, spatially coupled with population composition, urban form and public transport accessibility ratios. We find both the demand and supply of station-based car sharing to be unevenly distributed. Some of the most profound contributors to car sharing demand include middle income levels, middle and higher levels of education, higher shares of the population working in cultural sectors, higher shares of men, higher shares of multifamily housing, and higher strengths of the public transport regime compared to that of the private car. The paper discusses the implications of these findings for sustainable urban mobility, mobility justice and urban and transport planning.

• Westskog, Hege; Julsrud, Tom Erik; Kallbekken, Steffen; Frenken, Koen; Schor, Juliet & Standal, Karina (2021). The role of community sharing in sustainability transformation: case studies from Norway. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy. ISSN 1548-7733. 17(1), p. 334–348. doi: 10.1080/15487733.2021.1969820. Full text in Research Archive
• Normann, Susanne (2021). Re-living a Common Future in the Face of Ecological Disaster: Exploring (Elements of) Guarani and Kaiowá Collective Memories, Political Imagination, and Critiques. Human Arenas. ISSN 2522-5790. doi: 10.1007/s42087-021-00188-0. Full text in Research Archive
• Normann, Susanne (2021). “Time is our worst enemy:” Lived experiences and intercultural relations in the making of green aluminum. Journal of Social Issues (JSI). ISSN 0022-4537. doi: 10.1111/josi.12472. Full text in Research Archive
• Røe, Per Gunnar (2021). Sosiokulturelle stedsanalyser - et grunnlag for medvirkning i planlegging? In Schreiner, Knut (Eds.), Forankring Fryder: en bok om medvirkning i byutvikling og arkitektur. Universitetsforlaget. ISSN 978-82-15-02720-3. p. 82–91.
• Standal, Karina & Feenstra, Mariëlle (2021). Gender and solar energy in India's low-carbon energy transition. In Webb, Janette; Wade, Faye & Tingey, Margaret (Ed.), Research Handbook on Energy and Society. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISSN 9781839100703. p. 141–153.
• Westskog, Hege; Aase, Tor Halfdan & Leikanger, Iris (2021). The Norwegian trekking association: conditions for its continued existence with new tourism patterns. . Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism. ISSN 1502-2250. p. 1–19. doi: 10.1080/15022250.2021.1913219. Full text in Research Archive
• Winther, Tanja (2021). Searching for variation and complexity. In Podjed, Dan; Gorup, Meta; Borecky, Pavel & Guerrón Montero, Carla (Ed.), Why the world needs anthropologists. Routledge. ISSN 9781350147133. p. 85–98.
• Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson & Saglie, Inger-Lise (2021). Planlegging av vindkraftanlegg og kommunens rolle. In Hauge, Katrine Broch & Stokke, Knut Bjørn (Ed.), Integrert kystsoneforvaltning. Planfaglege, samfunnsvitskapelege og juridiske perspektiv. . Universitetsforlaget. ISSN 978-82-15-04508-5. p. 221–245.
• Stephenson, Janet; Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Jackson Inderberg, Tor Håkon (2021). Energy cultures and national decarbonisation pathways. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. ISSN 1364-0321. 137. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110592. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Global climate change negotiations are delivering expectations that all nations must commit to rapidly reducing their reliance on fossil fuels. It is unclear why there is such significant variability in nations’ decarbonisation ambitions. We use the lens of ‘energy cultures’ to explore what insights this analysis can offer to this question. We suggest that a country’s ‘energy culture’ can be envisaged as the interplay between normative, material, institutional and policy-related attributes of the national decision-making apparatus. This provides a meta-framework which underpins our exploration of factors which previous studies suggest may shape national energy ambitions. We apply this framework to case studies of India, Denmark, China and Russia to see whether it has explanatory power across diverse cases, initially using four empirical indicators. There was no consistent correlation between the indicators and low-carbon ambitions, which led us to draw more deeply and inductively on the cultural influences evident in each nation over a 30-year period. Our findings suggest that national low-carbon ambitions are strongly cultural, contingent upon how any particular nation sees the role of energy, and the choices, policies, investments and actions that flow from this. This energy culture may constrain the extent to which nations are willing to respond to the challenge of climate change. The analysis indicates how nations require very different stimuli if they are to strengthen their low-carbon trajectories. We conclude that the concept of national energy cultures is a useful addition to approaches that are examining how to raise national low-carbon ambitions.

• Skjærseth, Jon Birger; Andresen, Steinar E; Bang, Guri & Heggelund, Gørild (2021). The Paris agreement and key actors’ domestic climate policy mixes: comparative patterns. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. ISSN 1567-9764. 21(1), p. 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10784-021-09531-w. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  This article examines two important conditions for achieving the Paris Agreement’s (PA) ambitious goals. The first is the actions of the largest emitters ¬China, the European Union (EU) and the USA whose combined share of global emissions is near 50%. The second condition is the bottom–up design of the PA itself. Drawing on the policy mix literature and comparison of the three major emitters examined in this special feature (see Bang, Heggelund and Skjærseth), we first conclude that the EU has the most ambitious climate targets and policy mixes needed for achieving net zero emissions. Second, the PA has contributed to more ambitious targets and policy mixes mainly in the EU but also in China. Ambitious EU actors have actively invoked the PA goals to further their interests and legalize the Agreement’s dynamic five-year cycles. With Biden as president the USA will again be a party to the PA and is set to join the EU and China in upgrading ambitions. Looking towards the future, the USA and particularly China will have to, in one way or another, to follow the EU if net zero emissions are to be achieved. This may necessitate actual EU leadership by example.

• Bailey, Ian; Fitch-Roy, Oscar; Jackson Inderberg, Tor Håkon & Benson, David J. (2021). Idealism, pragmatism, and the power of compromise in the negotiation of New Zealand's Zero Carbon Act. Climate Policy. ISSN 1469-3062. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2020.1868393. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Discursive choices made by policy entrepreneurs are an important factor in the development of climate change acts (CCAs). This article examines the extent to which such choices reflect the strategic need for CCA entrepreneurs to compromise pragmatically and modulate their policy preferences in order to secure the agreement needed for CCA adoption. Drawing upon theoretical insights from discursive institutionalism (DI) and policy entrepreneurship, this article analyses discursive choices during negotiations surrounding the New Zealand Zero Carbon Act (ZCA). The analysis shows that endogenous political-ideological constraints compelled entrepreneurial actors to modify first-choice preferences for emissions reduction legislation by reframing their coordinative discursive interventions to accommodate potentially oppositional groups. Further research is required into the conditions under which such strategies become discursively operational, to provide guidance to climate policy entrepreneurs as CCAs continue to diffuse globally.

• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2021). Towards a European Green Deal: The evolution of EU climate and energy policy mixes. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. ISSN 1567-9764. 21, p. 25–41. doi: 10.1007/s10784-021-09529-4.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald; Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson & Jevnaker, Torbjørg (2021). Is political steering gone with the wind? Administrative power and wind energy licensing practices in Norway . Energy Research & Social Science. ISSN 2214-6296. 74. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.101963. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  The conflicts and potential trade-offs between renewable energy development and nature protection are evident in policies aimed at promoting windpower, particularly in nature areas under high pressure from human activities. However, surprisingly little is known about the influence of political steering on windpower licensing practices. This article examines how political steering has affected the weight accorded to environmental considerations in the licensing practices of the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE). We find that the NVE enjoys significant discretion in interpreting and implementing political decisions, and that the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy (OED) has not provided clear steering signals regarding nature protection. Political pressures for expanded renewable energy production are reflected in the significant attention paid to economic and technical considerations in the licensing process. We conclude that ministerial steering signals and the NVE’s technocratic culture have pushed in the same direction: greater development of windpower, at the expense of transparent and predictable consideration for nature concerns.

• Eikeland, Per Ove & Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2021). The politics of low-carbon innovation: Implementing the European Union's strategic energy technology plan. Energy Research & Social Science. ISSN 2214-6296. 76. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102043.
• Priya Uteng, Tanu; Espegren, Hans Martin; Throndsen, Torstein S. & Böcker, Lars (2020). The gendered dimension of multimodality: Exploring the bike-sharing scheme of Oslo. In Priya Uteng, Tanu; Christensen, Hilda Rømer & Levin, Lena (Ed.), Gendering Smart Mobilities. Routledge. ISSN 9781138608276. p. 162–187. doi: 10.4324/9780429466601-10.
• Jackson Inderberg, Tor Håkon (2020). Centrally Decentralising? Analysing Key Policies and Pathways in Norway's Electricity Transitions. Politics and Governance. ISSN 2183-2463. 8(3). doi: 10.17645/pag.v8i3.2874. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  With national electricity systems, ‘transition’ may involve decentralising production and ownership, and digitalising the system. These processes are facilitated by smart metering, ‘prosuming,’ and changes in consumer behaviour. Driving factors may be national steering, or the process can be left to the market. In Norway, the government has opted for tightly steered national coordination of three key areas: national smart-meter implementation (since 2011), prosumer regulation (since 2016), and a national end-user demand flexibility regulation (expected to be adopted in 2020). These regulations influence production patterns, energy flows and grid activities. Drawing on organisational fields theory, this article asks: Why was it decided to adopt these policies centrally? Which actors have had greatest influence on policy outputs? And, finally, what of the possible implications? The regulations, developed in a sector in a state of field crisis, have generally been supported by the relevant actors. The Norwegian case can help to explain incumbent roles and field crisis, as well as nuanced drivers in complex transitions, beyond decarbonisation.

• Böcker, Lars; Priya Uteng, Tanu; Throndsen, Torstein S. & Anderson, Ellinor Ragnhild (2020). Bike sharing use in conjunction to public transport: Exploring spatiotemporal, age and gender dimensions in Oslo, Norway. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. ISSN 0965-8564. 138(August 2020), p. 389–401. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.06.009. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Bike sharing could provide a key role in a transition towards a less car dependent and more sustainable, healthy and socially inclusive urban transport future. This paper investigates two important prerequisites for bike sharing to fulfil these premises: Does it synergise rather than compete with current alternatives to car-based urban mobility; and is it inclusively accessible across population and spatial segments? Drawing on complete 2016–2017 trip records of the Oslo (Norway) bike sharing system, this paper analyses the potential use of bike sharing for accessing, egressing and interchanging public transport and explores its age and gender dimensions. Bike sharing ridership is substantially higher on routes that either start or end with metro/rail connectivity, whilst controlling for other factors, such as route distance, elevation, urban form, time of day and bike dock capacities. However, our results also reveal that bike sharing – both as a stand-alone system and in conjunction with public transport – is less accessible to, suited to, and used by women and older age groups. Especially gender biases appear profound, multifaceted, and intersected by spatial inequalities favouring central male-dominated employment areas. These findings are discussed to derive policy and design directions regarding multimodal integration, dock expansion, rental limitations, and the introduction of e-bikes, to improve the performance, multimodal integration, gender equality and overall socio-spatial inclusiveness of bike sharing.

• Westskog, Hege; Amundsen, Helene; Christiansen, Petter & Tønnesen, Anders (2020). Urban contractual agreements as an adaptive governance strategy: under what conditions do they work in multi-level cooperation? Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. ISSN 1523-908X. 22(4), p. 554–567. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2020.1784115. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  The Norwegian urban growth agreement (UGA) is a governance platform combining transport-infrastructure development with land-use and transport policy. It is a policy package of measures involving network cooperation between national, regional and local government levels established to coordinate transport and land-use development. Shared responsibility for goal achievement, autonomy and learning and adaptation as new knowledge and experience arise are clear prerequisites for the UGAs. This makes it relevant to investigate the conditions for the UGAs to work as an adaptive governance strategy because their central features are in line with the attributes of adaptive governance. Further, adaptive governance is an approach to handle complex problems like transport development issues. The study shows that UGAs have several strengths in terms of autonomy and learning. However, the multi-level cooperation in the UGAs is framed by complex underlying structures of roles and powers, which challenge the working and legitimacy of the governance structures. Multi-level adaptive governance processes like the UGAs require attention to issues of power and legitimacy. Securing transparency and democratic anchorage is paramount in bringing such processes in line with the intended benefits of adaptive governance.

• Szulecki, Kacper & Øverland, Indra (2020). Energy democracy as a process, an outcome and a goal: A conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science. ISSN 2214-6296. 69, p. 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101768. Full text in Research Archive
• Saglie, Inger-Lise; Jackson Inderberg, Tor Håkon & Rognstad, Helga (2020). What shapes municipalities’ perceptions of fairness in windpower developments? Local Environment : the International Journal of Justice and Sustainability. ISSN 1354-9839. 25(2), p. 147–161. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2020.1712342. Full text in Research Archive
• Normann, Susanne (2020). Green colonialism in the Nordic context: Exploring Southern Saami representations of wind energy development. Journal of Community Psychology. ISSN 0090-4392. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22422. Full text in Research Archive
• Jackson Inderberg, Tor Håkon; Theisen, Ole Magnus & Flåm, Karoline Hægstad (2020). What influences windpower decisions? A statistical analysis of licensing in Norway. Journal of Cleaner Production. ISSN 0959-6526. 273. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122860. Show summary

  While windpower is expanding globally, so too is the concern over increased land-use pressure and the environmental impacts of large-scale power plants. In the literature, little is known about how local resistance and environmental impacts affect windpower licensing decisions. This article addresses this knowledge gap by investigating the weight accorded these factors in a licensing process. Using a new and comprehensive dataset based on all windpower project applications in Norway 2000–2019, we statistically analyse whether environmental impact and the stance taken by local authorities influence the final licensing decision. Both factors are found to have a strong influence: a high environmental impact substantially reduces the likelihood of obtaining a licence, and a negative hosting municipality in practice has almost veto power. Our findings have important implications for research on energy democracy, energy justice and fairness, environmental policy integration and the acceptance literature. As little quantitative research has examined how environmental factors and stakeholder positions affect licensing decisions, this article contributes general insights and an analytical approach which can be used comparatively across contexts and sectors.

• Jackson Inderberg, Tor Håkon; Sæle, Hanne; Westskog, Hege & Winther, Tanja (2020). The dynamics of solar prosuming: Exploring interconnections between actor groups in Norway. Energy Research & Social Science. ISSN 2214-6296. 70, p. 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101816. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Solar prosuming is an emerging phenomenon in which many actor groups are involved in shaping new solutions. Here we study national policymakers, relevant stakeholders such as grid companies, and the prosumers themselves – and the interconnections between them – to provide a contextualised exploration of positions, perceptions and interconnections that influence prosuming activities. Our 65 in-depth interviews in Norway, 33 of which with pioneering prosumers show that this group is not attracted to prosuming primarily for financial reasons, but for pursuing particular identities. However, our results also indicate that if prosuming were to become more widespread, economic considerations would be central. Further, the interplay among actor groups, mediated through current regulations and technologies, and the related perceptions, affect the uptake and organisation of solar prosuming activities. Third-party market actors such as the solar and building industry play important roles, as do grid companies and municipalities that are expected to facilitate prosuming activities. Given the current policy framework in Norway, we conclude that if increasing prosuming activities becomes a desired political goal, this will require stronger financial incentives for individual prosumers, and a deeper understanding of the interplay among actors across arenas and sectors.

• Żuk, Piotr & Szulecki, Kacper (2020). Unpacking the right-populist threat to climate action: Poland's pro-governmental media on energy transition and climate change. Energy Research & Social Science. ISSN 2214-6296. 66. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101485. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Is populist politics a threat to ambitious climate action and decarbonisation of energy systems? With the coinciding challenges of an alleged global ‘populist wave,’ and the growing visibility of a planetary climate crisis, this issue has gained relevance. While theoretical literature on the links between populism and climate action is growing, there is still little empirical evidence regarding the ways in which the thin ideology of populism can interact with climate policy in practice (particularly in the context of Eastern Europe). We look into this black box, by analyzing the Polish right-wing populist media discourses on energy and climate. Poland is widely perceived as a laggard in European climate policy and energy transition, seeking to safeguard domestic coal as a major energy source and opposing ambitious decarbonisation goals. At the same time, since 2015 it has seen a right-wing populist government in power, making it a very interesting case for an analysis of the interaction of populist politics and climate action. Using four key elements of populist political rhetoric as a framework (a populist episteme, Manichean good and evil connotations and internal enemies) we organize the arguments distilled from a wide reading of pro-governmental right-wing Polish media, to illustrate the content of populist climate and energy discourse, seeing some of the tropes found in our case as generalizable to other national contexts.

• Hjorteset, Mari Andrine & Böcker, Lars (2020). Car sharing in Norwegian urban areas: Examining interest, intention and the decision to enrol. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. ISSN 1361-9209. 84, p. 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102322.
• Leiren, Merethe Dotterud; Jackson Inderberg, Tor Håkon & Rayner, Tim (2020). Policy styles, opportunity structures and proportionality: Comparing renewable electricity policies in the UK. International Political Science Review. ISSN 0192-5121. p. 1–15. doi: 10.1177/0192512120907112. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Researchers expect under-reaction in climate policy. However, this might differ depending on the access of different interest groups to a political system. To explore the relationship between entrenched patterns of domestic politics and proportionality of climate policy, we compare two renewables policies which financially support new renewable electricity in the UK. Drawing on the literature on policy styles and related opportunity structures, this article shows that UK political parties have responded to growing public concern and NGO pressure by, at times, trying to out-green one another to win votes. However, powerful industry actors have been influential in shaping UK renewables policies, in particular when political competition about the individual policies has been low. The findings suggest that an over-reaction in terms of exceeding the marginal costs of renewable electricity production is equally likely under conditions of high or low political competition.

• Kiil, Maiken Bjerga & Jordhus-Lier, David Christoffer (2020). Internasjonale lærdommer. In Hagen, Inger Marie & Bjergene, Jon Olav (Ed.), Grønne tariffavtaler. Gyldendal Akademisk. ISSN 9788205538900. p. 90–118.
• Böcker, Lars & Anderson, Ellinor Ragnhild (2020). Interest-adoption discrepancies, mechanisms of mediation and socio-spatial inclusiveness in bike-sharing: The case of nine urban regions in Norway. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. ISSN 0965-8564. 140(October), p. 266–277. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.08.020. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Bike sharing systems are increasingly promoted as a quick, accessible, affordable, and healthy transport alternative in a less car-dependent urban mobility system. The objective of this article is to elucidate the social and spatial inclusiveness of bike sharing, by exploring its intersectionality with user backgrounds and residential contexts, and its mechanisms of mediation by attitudes, mobility resources and daily mobility patterns. Hereto, the paper examines and cross-compares the discrepancies between stated bike sharing interest and reported bike sharing membership, amongst a sample of 3672 residents of urban regions in Norway in structural equation models (SEM). Our results indicate that interest is positively influenced by early adopter characteristics, such as young age, full-time work, environmental consciousness, urban outlook, urban residential locations, and the current adoption of combined bicycle and public transport use. In contrast, reported bike sharing membership is explained more typically as a travel behaviour: with reduced effects of attitudes; enhanced effects of residential urban form and bicycle-public transport use; and additional negative effects of car and bike ownership. The paper concludes by discussing these and other interest-adoption discrepancies across social and spatial categories, to derive policy and research directions for inclusive bike sharing.

• Westskog, Hege; Aase, Tor Halfdan; Standal, Karina & Tellefsen, Sølvi (2020). Sharing among neighbours in a Norwegian suburb. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. ISSN 2210-4224. 37, p. 39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2020.07.010. Full text in Research Archive
• Wikstrøm, Ragnhild Dahl & Böcker, Lars (2020). Changing Suburban Daily Mobilities in Response to a Mobility Intervention: A Qualitative Investigation of an e-Bike Trial. Sustainability. ISSN 2071-1050. 12(6). doi: 10.3390/su12062413.
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger & Eikeland, Per Ove (2020). Oil and power industries' responses to EU emissions trading:leaders or laggards? In Wurzel, R.K.W.; Liefferink, D & Torney, D (Ed.), Pioneers, Leaders and Followers in Multilevel and Polycentric Climate Governance. . Routledge. ISSN 9780367467593. p. 104–125.
• Solnørdal, Mette Talseth & Nilsen, Elin Anita (2020). From Program to Practice: Translating Energy Management in a Manufacturing Firm. Sustainability. ISSN 2071-1050. 12(23). doi: 10.3390/su122310084. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  A promising way to stimulate industrial energy efficiency is via energy management (EnM) practices. There is, however, limited knowledge on the implementation process of EnM in manufacturing firms. Aiming to fill this research gap, this study explores the implementation of a corporateenvironmentalprograminanincumbentfirmandtheensuingemergenceofEnMpractices. Translation theoryand the‘travel ofmanagement ideas’is used asa theoretical lensin this case study when analysing the process over a period of 10 years. Furthermore, based on a review and synthesis of prior studies, a ‘best EnM practice’ is developed and used as a baseline when assessing the EnM practices of the case firm. Building on this premise, we highlight four main findings: the pattern of translation dynamics, the key role of the energy manager during the implementation process, the abstraction level of the environmental program and, ‘translation competence’ as a new EnM practice. Managerial and policy implications, as well as avenues for further research, are provided based on these results.

• Solnørdal, Mette Talseth & Thyholdt, Sverre Braathen (2019). Absorptive capacity and energy efficiency in manufacturing firms – An empirical analysis in Norway. Energy Policy. ISSN 0301-4215. 132, p. 978–990. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.069. Full text in Research Archive

View all works in Cristin

• Winther, Tanja (2022). Refleksjoner rundt kjønn i energiomstillingen .
• Winther, Tanja (2022). What is fair? Reflections on energy transitions and fairness from a bottom-up perspective .
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2022). Regjeringen vil ta alle klimakutt hjemme. [Newspaper]. Aftenposten og E24.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2022). Høyre vil ha mer vindkraft på land. [Newspaper]. Aftenposten.
• Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson (2022). Muligheter og utfordringer i et nytt konsesjonssystem for vindkraft. Show summary

  Presenterte forskningsfunn og anbefalinger for design av nytt konsesjonssystem til energi- og vannressursavdelingen i Olje- og energidepartementet.

• Winther, Tanja (2022). Forbrukersperspektiver.
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2022). The Evolution of EU Climate Policies: From single instruments to policy packages.
• Hansen, Arve (2022). (Un)sustainable consumption and everyday life.
• Hansen, Arve (2022). How meat consumption has changed in Vietnam. [Radio]. Tra Da Chats.
• Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson; Eikeland, Per Ove & Taranger, Karianne Krohn (2022). Can energy transitions be just? Insights from Include and windpower processes in Norway.
• Solnørdal, Mette Talseth & Westskog, Hege (2022). Lokalmat som klima- og miljøomstillingsstrategi. .
• Westskog, Hege (2022). Småskalalandbruk prosjekt - fokus og metode.
• Westskog, Hege (2022). Kommunenes rolle i omstilling til lavutslippssamfunnet - Hole.
• Westskog, Hege (2022). Lokalmat som omstillingsstrategi - noen foreløpige resultater.
• Winther, Tanja (2022). Wider issues of social acceptance in the energy transition with learnings from cases.
• Winther, Tanja (2022). Pathways to Just Transition - Authors' views.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2022). Utslippskutt hjemme eller ute? Støre-regjeringens hodepine: Norges klimamål er i det blå. Aftenposten Innsikt. ISSN 1890-6931. p. 94–99.
• Smørdal, Ole (2022). SPARK Social Innovation Educational Forum: Erfaringer fra partnerskap mellom offentlige, private og sosiale aktører.
• Westskog, Hege & Tønnesen, Anders (2022). Klimaomstilling og sunt bondevett. Adresseavisen. ISSN 0805-3804.
• Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson (2022). Some challenges for Norway’s energy policies.
• Westskog, Hege (2022). Rike land koker kloden - hvem tar regninga. [Journal]. Fri Tanke.
• Westskog, Hege (2022). Kommunenes rolle i omstilling til lavutslippssamfunnet.
• Westskog, Hege (2022). Klimaomstilling i distriktene.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2022). Vind i kommuneseilene. Aftenposten Innsikt. ISSN 1890-6931. p. 48–53.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2022). Vindkraftutbygging handler om mye mer enn kostnadsanslag. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.). ISSN 0804-3116.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2022). Das Geschäft nach dem Öl: Norwegen setzt auf Windkraft – und Deutschland profitiert. [Newspaper]. Der Tagesspiegel.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2022). Norske klimagassutslipp kun ned med 0,3% i 2021. [Radio]. Studio 2 NRK P2.
• Rosendal, G. Kristin & Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2022). Balancing climate and nature in renewable energy development: the stormy case of Norwegian wind power.
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2022). Vindkraft og politisk dynamikk - fra EU press til lokal motstand. Hva kan vi lære fra land til hav?
• Westskog, Hege (2022). Deling som bærekraftig omstillingsstrategi.
• Mygland, Reidunn & Westskog, Hege (2022). Rettferdig omstilling.
• Westskog, Hege (2022). Kommunenes rolle i omstilling til lavutslippsamfunnet. .
• Westskog, Hege & Hårklau, Line (2022). I hytte og vær. [Journal]. Fjell og Vidde.
• Abram, Simone Almond (2021). New Technologies, Ethics and Policy Engagement for Sustainable Development: Universal Access to Energy. Show summary

  What are some of the most promising new and emerging technologies to ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all? What is their development and demonstration status? What remains to be done? What scale of investment is needed? What are some of the key ethical, legal and policy-related concerns? And how can you engage in UN and IEEE activities in this space? This event will address these key questions and more via presentations by leading technologists, moderated discussion with speakers, and Q&A sessions with attendees.

• Abram, Simone Almond (2021). SIMONE ABRAM: ETHNOGRAPHY, ETHICS IN ENERGY GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABILITY CHALLENGES . [Internet]. worldpodcasts.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2021). Derfor fikk vi kommuneopprøret mot vindkraft. [Newspaper]. Aftenposten.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2021). Motvind kan puste lettet ut. [Newspaper]. Aftenposten.
• Maske, Julie & Westskog, Hege (2021). DNT under lupen. [Journal]. Fjell og Vidde.
• Tønnesen, Anders & Westskog, Hege (2021). Kortreiste kretsløp - muligheter og dilemma.
• Tønnesen, Anders & Westskog, Hege (2021). Kortreiste kretsløp - muligheter og dilemmaer.
• Lindberg, Marie Byskov & Jackson Inderberg, Tor Håkon (2021). Egenproduksjon av strøm i boligselskaper.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2021). Oljesmurt elektrifisering gir utslipp og naturinngrep. [Newspaper]. Aftenposten.
• Holst, Inga Ragnhild & Torvanger, Asbjørn (2021). Lite biogass i regjeringens nye energimelding. [Internet]. Biogassbransjen.no.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2021). Dyr og dårlig utredet elektrifisering. [Newspaper]. Aftenposten.
• Lindberg, Marie Byskov (2021). Tysklands gassforbuk: Er gass bruteknologi eller neste til å fases ut etter kull?
• Sætre, Sjur & Westskog, Hege (2021). Risken med å låne. . [Radio]. NRK.
• Sætre, Sjur & Westskog, Hege (2021). Hjelper det å låne med en app? . [Radio]. NRK.
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2021). European Green Deal: Konsekvenser for klimapolitikk og klassifisering av bærekraftig finans.
• Hansen, Arve (2021). Forbruk og endringer i hverdagslivet - på hvilke måter har nedstengingen forsterket eller endret husholdningers rutiner og vaner?
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2021). Vindkampen. [Journal]. Fjell og vidde .
• Jackson Inderberg, Tor Håkon (2021). The climate vs. the environment debate . Show summary

  The lecture was about the tradeoffs, conflicts and synergies of climate and (local) environemntal considerations in general, and with examples from management of windpower planning and licensing in Norway.

• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald; Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson & Valberg, Anna Helene (2021). Vindkraft: Vinden som snudde. [Internet]. forskning.no.
• Volden, Johannes R. (2021). Mat, helse og bærekraft: Hvilken rolle spiller mat for bærekraftig utvikling? Mat og helse i skolen. ISSN 1890-3193. p. 28–34. Show summary

  Tilgjengelig online: https://www.sum.uio.no/forskning/publikasjoner/2021/mat-helse-og-barekraft.pdf

• Skjærseth, Jon Birger; Andresen, Steinar E; Bang, Guri & Gørild, Heggelund (2021). Kan Paris-avtalen nås? Status og utsikter for klimapolitikken i EU, Kina og USA. Energi og Klima : Norsk klimastiftelses nettmagasin. Show summary

  EU, Kina og USA står for nesten halvparten av de globale klimagassutslippene. Disse aktørene er også de mest toneangivende i internasjonalt klimasamarbeid. Hvordan de vil innrette seg vil være avgjørende for om Parisavtalens mål om netto-null utslipp nås. Status så langt er at innsatsen og resultatene har vært omvendt proporsjonalt med hvor mye de slipper ut – de som har sluppet ut mest har gjort minst for å redusere utslipp. Men utsiktene ser unektelig lysere ut med Biden i det Hvite Hus, EUs Green Deal og Kinas mål om netto-null utslipp innen 2060.

• Standal, Karina (2021). Fleksibelt strømforbruk i husholdninger.
• Szulecki, Kacper (2021). Are populists a threat to climate action?
• Stokstad, Sigrid (2021). Sprikende lovgivning om arealbruk. Hvordan kan plan- og bygningsloven bli et bedre redskap for samordning?
• Fæhn, Taran; Holtsmark, Katinka Kristine & Halvorsen, Kristin (2021). Klimaplanen, hva nå?
• Szulecki, Kacper (2021). The ups and downs of inclusive energy governance: Participation, panels and populism.
• Szulecki, Kacper (2021). Will the year 2021 be a breakthrough for climate policy?
• Szulecki, Kacper (2021). Are the Poles no longer afraid of nuclear energy?
• Szulecki, Kacper (2021). A Just Transition.
• Holtsmark, Katinka Kristine (2021). Kan klimapolitikken bli rettferdig?
• Holtsmark, Katinka Kristine (2021). Den norske elbilpolitikken er ikke bærekraftig. Dagens næringsliv. ISSN 0803-9372.
• Jordhus-Lier, David (2021). Klimaløsninger og handlingsalternativer i arbeidslivet.
• Szulecki, Kacper (2021). Norway’s “Climate Election” Is a Warning for the Rest of Europe. Green European Journal.
• Tennøy, Aud (2021). Oppstartsmøte med brukerpartnere i delprosjekt Byspredning, 9. juni 2021. Show summary

  Brukerpartnere til stede: heidi.fadum@helsedir.no; Maria.Rasmussen@ullensaker.kommune.no; ingers@viken.no; OyvindDaaland.Lesjo@lillestrom.kommune.no; grethe.frank.strand@ullensaker.kommune.no; guri.ugedahl@tromso.kommune.no; Anja Johnsen

• Greene, Mary; Hansen, Arve; Hoolohan, Claire; Süssbauer, Elisabeth & Domaneschi, Lorenzo (2021). Consumption and shifting temporalities of daily life during disruption: Undoing and reassembling household practice during COVID-19.
• Tennøy, Aud (2021). Deltakelse i debatt arrangert av NFR om bruk og misbruk av forskning. Show summary

  Sammen med Helge Orten, stortingsrepresentant for Høyre og leder av Stortingets transport- og kommunikasjonskomité

• Westskog, Hege (2021). Hvordan nå utslippsmålene sine? Er det så enkelt som 60% reduksjon? .
• Stokstad, Sigrid (2021). Fint for utbyggere, men hva med innbyggerne?
• Standal, Karina & Gloppen, Siri (2021). Klimakrisen i en urettferdig verden.
• Stokstad, Sigrid & Westskog, Hege (2021). The role of municipalities in achieving a low carbon society?
• Jordhus-Lier, David (2021). Hvor ble det av arbeideren i klimakampen? - velgeren og forbrukeren kan ikke dra lasset alene. Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift. ISSN 0800-336X. 2021(3), p. 233–236. doi: 10.18261.
• Jordhus-Lier, David (2021). Bør fagbevegelsen bry seg om arbeideres mobilitet og fleksibilitet, og er det egentlig et klimaspørsmål? .
• Winther, Tanja & Sundet, Øyvind (2021). Folks betalingsproblemer kan øke. Nationen. ISSN 0805-3782.
• Jackson Inderberg, Tor Håkon (2021). Konsesjonsordningen for vindkraft: Hva skjedde og hvordan blir det? .
• Jakobsen, Siw Ellen; Westskog, Hege & Leikanger, Iris (2021). Er «den norske» måten å være fotturist på truet? [Internet]. forskning.no.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald; Valberg, Anna Helene & Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson (2021). Windpower: The wind that shifted. [Internet]. Science Norway.
• Wikstrøm, Ragnhild Dahl & Røe, Per Gunnar (2021). Sustainable mobility transitions in suburbia - (dis)connections between transport planning and daily mobilities .
• Røe, Per Gunnar & Tveiten, Kristian (2021). Suburbanizing the Compact City Model: The Imagination of a Post-suburban Oslo Region.
• Røe, Per Gunnar & Tveiten, Kristian (2021). Suburbanizing the Compact City Model: The Imagination of a Post-suburban Oslo Region.
• Sævarsdottir, Margret; Hovland, marit & Smørdal, Ole (2021). ‘SustainableFood’, a school-NGO collaboration towards more sustainable food consumption".
• Westskog, Hege & Leikanger, Iris (2021). Can foreign tourists be trusted to clean Norwegian mountain cabins? . [Business/trade/industry journal]. Sciencenorway.no.
• Jackson Inderberg, Tor Håkon (2021). Storbritannias klimaomlegging: Gassens fremtidige rolle .
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2021). The Long and Winding Road of EU Climate Policies: From single instruments to policy packages.
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2021). EUs klimapolitikk mot netto-null i 2050: Hva skjer og hvordan påvirkes Norge?
• Westskog, Hege & Leikanger, Iris (2021). Er "den norske måten" å være fotturist på truet? . [Business/trade/industry journal]. Forskning.no.
• Jackson Inderberg, Tor Håkon (2021). ‘Smarting up’ the Norwegian electricity system: developments so far and possible implications for the future system and consumers.
• Jackson Inderberg, Tor Håkon (2021). New dimensions of energy poverty? Evolving requirements for household electricity consumer flexibility.
• Westskog, Hege (2021). NRK Ekko - Om båtdeling. [Radio]. NRK .
• Winther, Tanja (2021). Skisse til intervjuguide i fbm Ledes pilot for utprøving av ny modell for nettleie.
• Winther, Tanja (2021). Searching for Variation and Complexity (Book Launch Interview). [Internet]. YouTube.
• Winther, Tanja (2021). Synergimøte Include - COJUST/NTRANS.
• Winther, Tanja & Røe, Per Gunnar (2021). Innspill til Oslo Science City (mars, april, mai).
• Winther, Tanja (2021). Møte med Lyse Kraft.
• Winther, Tanja; Jordhus-Lier, David Christoffer & Westskog, Hege (2021). Presentasjon av Include.
• Westskog, Hege (2021). Kortreist-prosjektet.
• Røe, Per Gunnar; Smørdal, Ole & Westskog, Hege (2021). Includes prosjekter og rød tråd.
• Westskog, Hege & Jensen, Martin Huseby (2021). Storbykommunene skal kutte utslippene de neste årene - men hvordan har det gårr fram til i dag. [Business/trade/industry journal]. CNytt.
• Westskog, Hege (2021). Lillestrøms klimastrategi i et omstillingsperspektiv.
• Standal, Karina (2021). Gender in the energy transition.
• Røe, Per Gunnar (2021). Suburban Green Mobility. Challenges, Potentials, Paradoxes.
• Winther, Tanja (2021). En grønn omstilling må være rettferdig (i bilag til Aftenposten).
• Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson (2021). Sesjon 1: Tatt av vinden . Show summary

  Presenterte overordnede perspektiver på endringer i vindkraftpolitikk, og ledet parralellsesjonen.

• Winther, Tanja; Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson; Røe, Per Gunnar & Smørdal, Ole (2021). Møte med rep. fra Energi- og vassdragsavdelingen i Olje- og energidepartementet (OED).
• Winther, Tanja; Røe, Per Gunnar; Westskog, Hege; Smørdal, Ole & Berge, Erik (2021). Møte med Seksjon for innovasjon, samspill og instituttpolitikk, Avdeling for høyere utdanning, forskning og internasjonalt arbeid, Kunnskapsdepartementet (KD).
• Winther, Tanja (2021). Deltakelse i paneldebatt om innhold til FNs kommende utviklingsrapport .
• Røe, Per Gunnar (2021). Include: A Centre for Socially Inclusive Decarbonization and Energy Transition.
• Stokstad, Sigrid; Enger, Johanne Heen; Winther, Tanja; Olsen, Pål Erik & Sæther, Bjørnar (2021). Møte med Lillestrøm kommune, Ullensaker kommune og Viken fylkeskommune i forbindelse med prosjekt Medvirkning og sommerstudie.
• Tønnesen, Anders (2021). Integrative climate leadership in multilevel governance settings.
• Røe, Per Gunnar (2021). Include - Inclusive Decarboniztion and Energy Transition.
• Røe, Per Gunnar (2021). Sosial inkludering i områdeutvikling .
• Røe, Per Gunnar (2021). ”Smart Mobility Suburbs” - Et tverrfaglig forskningsprosjekt finansiert av NFR-programmet EnergiX.
• Røe, Per Gunnar (2021). Virkelig offentlige byrom.
• Greussing, Markus & Røe, Per Gunnar (2021). Kultur Montag: Spezial aus Oslo. [TV]. Österreichischer Rundfunk (ORF).
• Røe, Per Gunnar (2021). Sattelite centralities and communities. The social ambitions and failures of architecture in Oslo's new towns of 1950's-1970's.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2021). Ofrer vi naturen for å redde klima? [Radio]. NRK P2.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2021). Klimapolitikken kan være en modell for å løse naturkrisen. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.). ISSN 0804-3116.
• Torvanger, Asbjørn (2021). Jaktar desperat etter klimakutt. [Internet]. nrk.no.
• Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson (2021). Response to Alexander Dunlap's presentation on renewables neo colonialism.
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2021). EUs nye klimapakke mot 2030: Hva skjer og hvordan påvirkes Norge? .
• Winther, Tanja (2021). Socially just energy transition.
• Winther, Tanja; Westskog, Hege & Leikanger, Iris (2021). Arbeid med videreutvikling av maler for Midtveisrapportering.
• Winther, Tanja & Røe, Per Gunnar (2021). Møte med Include-partner A-lab.
• Winther, Tanja; Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson; Smørdal, Ole; Westskog, Hege & Berge, Erik (2021). Møte med Include-partner Troms og Finnmark fylkeskommune.
• Eikeland, Per Ove (2021). EU energy policy – developments and drivers . Show summary

  Presentation of long-term development in EU energy policy with analysis of drivers

• Winther, Tanja (2021). A socially just energy transition.
• Eikeland, Per Ove; Taranger, Karianne Krohn; Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson & Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2021). Vinden som skiftet retning.
• Jakobsen, Siw Ellen & Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson (2021). Det er ikke bare fattige som sliter med strømregningen. [Internet]. Forskning.no.
• Ludvigsen, Elin; Bergesen, Eirik & Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson (2021). Konfliktnivå og utbygging av vindkraft. [TV]. TV2. Show summary

  22 minutters studiodiskusjon om vindkraften i Norge: Er vi ferdig med å bygge vindmøller i Norge? Det er høyt konfliktnivå og utbygging av vindkraft er satt på vent. Men Norge trenger mer fornybar energi så hva er løsningen?

• Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson & Winther, Tanja (2021). - Jeg skammer meg sånn Nina (61) lever på strøm- prisens nåde. [Newspaper]. VG.
• Winther, Tanja; Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson; Solnørdal, Mette Talseth & Nilsen, Elin Anita (2021). Include - Fellesmøte med partnere i Tromsø.
• Winther, Tanja; Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson & Sundet, Øyvind (2021). Møte med Troms Kraft.
• Winther, Tanja (2021). Hvorfor Include?
• Lien, Marianne Elisabeth (2021). Comments to keynote speaker Tess Lea.
• Volden, Johannes Rudjord (2021). The quest for sustainable protein: Introduction. Matlære.
• Volden, Johannes Rudjord (2021). Flying Through a Perfect Moral Storm: How do Norwegian environmentalists negotiate their aeromobility practices? Mobile Lives Forum.
• Tønnesen, Anders (2021). Kommuner midt i klimakampen.
• Tennøy, Aud (2021). Fysisk planlegging for aktiv transport .
• Tennøy, Aud (2021). Samordnet og strategisk areal- og transportplanlegging: Hvorfor, hva, hvordan? .
• Tennøy, Aud (2021). Innspill til GrønNTP.
• Tennøy, Aud (2021). Klimavennlige, attraktive og levende byer – krever fortetting og konsentrasjon. .
• Tennøy, Aud (2021). Byar og tettstader med klimavennleg transport, levande sentrum og gode bumiljø. Er dette draumen? Og korleis kjem vi dit? .
• Tønnesen, Anders (2021). Social justice in the transformation of Norwegian urban mobility.
• Tønnesen, Anders (2021). Kortreiste kretsløp - muligheter og dilemma.
• Tønnesen, Anders (2021). Kortreiste kretsløp - muligheter og dilemma.
• Tønnesen, Anders (2021). Arealbruk – byutvikling og redusert privatbilisme.
• Tønnesen, Anders (2021). Transport and public planning in the Norwegian context.
• Torvanger, Asbjørn (2021). Blir bioenergi frå skogen viktig?
• Solnørdal, Mette Talseth (2021). Klimanøytral utvikling - hvordan få det til i Tromsø?
• Winther, Tanja (2021). Socially inclusive transitions.
• Winther, Tanja (2021). The Route from Energy Transitions to Social Transitions — Where do Women Stand? [Journal]. Energy and Gender in Asia: A regional review.
• Wethal, Ulrikke Bryn (2021). Bærekraftig forbruk – hvilken rolle kan og bør kommunen spille? .
• Wethal, Ulrikke Bryn (2021). Bærekraftig forbruk – hvilken rolle kan lokale initiativer spille? .
• Wethal, Ulrikke Bryn (2021). OMigjen Asker - Innsikt fra intervjudata .
• Wethal, Ulrikke Bryn (2021). Boundary traffic in the home-as-office.
• Volden, Johannes (2021). The quest for sustainable protein: Meat from plants? Matlære.
• Wethal, Ulrikke Bryn (2021). Vi må ta et oppgjør med eget forbruk. [Business/trade/industry journal]. KLIMA - Et magasin om klimaforskning fra CICERO.
• Wethal, Ulrikke Bryn (2021). Reworking boundaries in the home-as-office: Boundary traffic during Covid-19 lockdown and the future of working from home .
• Sundet, Øyvind (2021). Barrierer og muligheter for redusert kjøttforbruk: erfaringer fra norske husholdninger.
• Hansen, Arve (2021). Nedstenginga fekk mange til å revurdere eige forbruk.
• Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson (2021). Presentasjon av status og arbeid i arbeidspakke 1, Include (referansegruppemøte). Show summary

  Presentasjon av funn og overordnede planer for WP1, med vekt på doktorgradskandidatene i arbeidspakke 1.

• Winther, Tanja (2021). Frykter ny nettleiemodell vil føre til at flere sliter med strømregningen. [Business/trade/industry journal]. Europower Energi.
• Solnørdal, Mette Talseth (2021). Drivers to Energy Efficiency in Manufacturing Firms.
• Westskog, Hege (2021). Prosjekter i WP3, Include.
• Røe, Per Gunnar (2021). Prosjekter i WP2, Include.
• Smørdal, Ole (2021). Prosjekter i WP4, Include.
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2021). EUs nye klimapakke, Norge og energiteknologier: Status og utsikter.
• Sundet, Øyvind (2021). Husholdningers respons på og holdninger til tiltak for fleksibel strømbruk: resultater fra dybdeintervjuer blant husholdninger i Tromsø og Porsgrunn.
• Hansen, Arve (2021). Pandemic disruptions and everyday life: Consumption and sustainability during (and after) Covid-19.
• Sæle, Hanne; Aasen, Marianne & Standal, Karina (2021). Norske husholdninger sine strømvaner og motivasjon for endret strømforbruk.
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2021). Participation in DNV’s Energy Transition Collaboration Network for the production of the fifth edition of the Energy Transition Outlook .
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2021). EUs Fit for 55 klimapakke og konsekvenser for Norge.
• Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson (2021). Arbeidet i WP1 opp til nå og planer.
• Böcker, Lars (2021). Bompenger, miljøvennlig og rettferdig mobilitet.
• Inderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson (2021). Include WP1: Pågående arbeid og planer videre.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2021). Brølet fra bygda: Øya som ble delt i to. [TV]. NRK1. Show summary

  Dokumentar om vindkraftkonflikten på Haramsøya

• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2021). EUs Green Deal og klimaambisjoner: status, utsikter og konsekvenser for Norge.
• Westskog, Hege & Toft, Martin (2021). UiO-forskar med klimavarsel til politikarane. [Business/trade/industry journal]. Uniforum.
• Westskog, Hege; Hovelsrud , Grete K. & Benestad, Rasmus (2021). Ta tak i klimapolitikken -nå. Klassekampen. ISSN 0805-3839.
• Solnørdal, Mette Talseth (2021). Høring i Stortigets energi- og miljøkomité angående Meld. St. 13 (2020-2021) Klimaplan for 2021-2030 .
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger & Cetkovic, Stefan (2021). Creative and disruptive elements in Norway's climate policy mix. In Carter, Neil; Little, Conor & Torney, Diarmuid (Ed.), Climate Politics in Small European States. Routledge. ISSN 9780367639969.
• Standal, Karina (2020). Likestilling og kjønnsperspektiver på klima og energiomstilling.
• Standal, Karina (2020). Gender perspectives on the global energy transition.
• Winther, Tanja; Jackson Inderberg, Tor Håkon; Røe, Per Gunnar; Westskog, Hege & Smørdal, Ole (2020). Dialogmøte med OED om Include.
• Szulecki, Kacper (2020). Europe’s greenest Commission ever faces an unprecedented challenge as the clock ticks. Dahrendorf Forum.
• Standal, Karina (2020). Likestilling og grønt skifte. KLIMA - Et magasin om klimaforskning fra CICERO.
• Hansen, Arve (2020). Utan mindre forbruk er det grøne skiftet ein illusjon. SUM-bloggen.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2020). Vi trenger en nasjonal oversikt over vindkraftens arealbeslag. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.). ISSN 0804-3116.
• Winther, Tanja (2020). Frokostseminar - Inkluderende energiomstilling: temaer, perspektiver og erfaringer fra tidligere forskning. Frokostseminar arrangert av Include og CIENS.
• Winther, Tanja (2020). Forskningssenteret Include: Det rasjonale, planer og potensielle utfordringer.
• Tønnesen, Anders (2020). Byvekstavtaler: Hvordan skape aksept for omstillingstiltak som berører flere styringsnivåer?
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2020). Ensidig syn på vindkraft. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.). ISSN 0804-3116.
• Winther, Tanja (2020). Include - Forskningssenter for sosialt inkluderende omstilling.
• Røe, Per Gunnar (2020). Include - A centre for socially inclusive solutions through co-creation with stakeholders.
• Røe, Per Gunnar (2020). Sosiale implikasjoner av regional plan for Oslo og Akershus (eller av post-suburban planlegging).
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2020). Miljøhensyn og medvirkning i vindkraftsaker.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2020). Slåss mot vindmøller. [Radio]. Dagbladet Podcast: Siste med Marie Simonsen.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2020). Synspunkter på stortingsmeldingen Vindkraft på land - Endringer i konsesjonsbehandlingen (Meld. St. 28 (2019-2020).
• Szulecki, Kacper (2020). Poland: Developing renewables in a land of coal .
• Holsten, Hilde; Böcker, Lars & Wikstrøm, Ragnhild Dahl (2020). Kan muligheten til å teste elsykkel gjøre at man endrer reisevaner? [Internet]. Includes nettside. Show summary

  Bærum kommune lot arbeidstakere i kommunen teste elsykkel gratis over en periode. Vil de endre reisevaner?

• Abram, Simone Almond (2020). Coronavirus: world’s response has slashed CO₂ emissions – here’s how to keep them down. The Conversation. ISSN 2201-5639. Show summary

  How do you respond to a crisis? It’s obvious that the response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been dramatically different to anything provoked by repeated scientific warnings about climate change. The many organisations that declared climate emergencies throughout 2019 and 2020 have so far enacted nothing like the scale and speed of action to limit the spread of coronavirus.

• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2020). Green, Grey or no Deal? EU climate and energy policies .
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2020). EUs Green Deal og konsekvenser for Norge.
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2020). Grønn, grå eller ingen Deal? EUs klima/energipolitikk og konsekvenser for Norge i krisetider.
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2020). Intervju med Energi og Klima om EUs klimamål. [Internet]. Energi og Klima.
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2020). EUs håndtering av karbonlekkasje: status og utsikter.
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2020). European Green Deal and consequences for climate policy.
• Røe, Per Gunnar (2020). Inkluderende by- og regional utvikling. Hvordan kan omstillingen til lavutslippssamfunnet være sosialt inkluderende? Innledning til sesjon.
• Røe, Per Gunnar (2020). Include - steder i endring.
• Røe, Per Gunnar (2020). Hvordan kan bærekraftig byutvikling bli sosialt inkluderende?
• Røe, Per Gunnar (2020). Include.Inclusive decarbonization and energy transition.
• Røe, Per Gunnar (2020). Include. Inclusive public spaces.
• Røe, Per Gunnar (2020). Hvordan kommer koronaepidemien til å påvirke arbeids- og levevaner framover? [TV]. NRK nyheter.
• Røe, Per Gunnar (2020). Include: A Centre for Socially Inclusive Decarbonization and Energy Transition.
• Westskog, Hege (2020). Fellesgoder må forvaltes varsomt. . Kommunal rapport. ISSN 0801-6410.
• Szulecki, Kacper & Bialas, Patryk (2020). What are your associations with Upper Silesia? Perspectives for the regions just transition. [Internet]. Slaska Opinia - Online. Show summary

  O zmianach na Górnym Śląsku i zielonej energii w rozmowie Patryka Białasa i Kacpra Szuleckiego, Kultura Liberalna.

• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2020). Ingen lokal vetorett mot vindkraft. [Newspaper]. Dagens Næringsliv.
• Westskog, Hege (2020). Kretsløpsøkonomien må være rettesnor. . Kommunal rapport. ISSN 0801-6410.
• Jevnaker, Torbjørg (2020). Hva er formålet med fjerde energimarkedspakke?
• Winther, Tanja; Standal, Karina; Szulecki, Kacper & Abram, Simone Almond (2020). How to achieve a socially inclusive and just transition to a low-carbon society? Innspill til Kunnskapsdepartementet fra Include-forskere. Show summary

  Response to invitation from the Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research regarding inputs to EU's Higher Education European Commission (European Research Area and European Green Deal)

• Westskog, Hege (2020). Kommunene er viktige brikker i klimaarbeidet. Kommunal rapport. ISSN 0801-6410.
• Westskog, Hege & Amundsen, Helene (2020). Byvekstavtaler - muligheter og utfordringer.
• Aasen, Marianne; Jackson Inderberg, Tor Håkon; Standal, Karina; Sæle, Hanne; Westskog, Hege & Winther, Tanja (2020). Hvem kan jevne ut strømbruken sin? Teknisk Ukeblad. ISSN 0040-2354.
• Jordhus-Lier, David Christoffer (2020). Hvorfor er ikke lærerne i klimastreik?
• Jordhus-Lier, David Christoffer (2020). Klimaengasjement i fagbevegelsen.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2020). Stormfullt om vindkraft. [TV]. NRK Debatten.
• Volden, Johannes R.; Wethal, Ulrikke Bryn & Hansen, Arve (2020). Everyday Life in a Pandemic: Norway.
• Stokstad, Sigrid & Westskog, Hege (2020). The role of municipalities in achieving a low carbon society?
• Abram, Simone Almond & Pegram, Tom (2020). Net-zero carbon emissions won’t be sustainable if social inequalities aren’t addressed. The Conversation. ISSN 2201-5639.
• Wethal, Ulrikke Bryn; Hansen, Arve & Volden, Johannes R. (2020). Everyday life in a Pandemic. Endringer i sosiale praksiser: Tilpasning, eksperimentering og bærekraft.
• Stokstad, Sigrid (2020). Inkluderende by- og regionalutvikling. Hvordan kan omstillingen til lavutslippssamfunnet være sosialt inkluderende?
• Standal, Karina (2020). Flexeffect prosjektet: Tiltak for fleksibelt strømforbruk i husholdninger.
• Standal, Karina (2020). Kjønnsperspektiver på energiomstilling.
• Holsten, Hilde & Jackson Inderberg, Tor Håkon (2020). Why some municipalities accept windpower farms. [Business/trade/industry journal]. sciencenorway.com.
• Kjerstin, Gjengedal & Standal, Karina (2020). Forsking på energispørsmål er ikkje kjønnsnøytralt. [Business/trade/industry journal]. Kilden - kjønnsforskning.no.
• Jordhus-Lier, David Christoffer (2020). Pedagoger i en særstilling? Bærekraft på arbeidsplassen.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2020). Klimaeliten forstår ikke vindkraftmotstanden. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.). ISSN 0804-3116.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2020). Uavhengig forskning om vindkraft. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.). ISSN 0804-3116.
• Winther, Tanja & Smørdal, Ole (2020). Dialgmøte med Utdanningsforbundet.
• Sævarsdottir, Margret; Hovland, Marit & Smørdal, Ole (2020). Matvinn - samarbeid mellom frivillige og skolen om bærekraft .
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2020). Nå skal kommunene styre vindkraften - for hvem og hvor? . [Business/trade/industry journal]. Kommunal rapport.
• Hansen, Arve (2020). Forbruksignoransen. Spire.
• Stokstad, Sigrid (2020). Hvem har ansvaret for overgang til lavutslippssamfunnet, og hvilke interesser ivaretas på veien?
• Bredvold, Torjus Lunder & Standal, Karina (2020). Energifattigdom – også i Norge. KLIMA - Et magasin om klimaforskning fra CICERO.
• Jordhus-Lier, David Christoffer (2020). Appell.
• Smørdal, Ole (2020). Bærekraft i fagfornyelsen.
• Westskog, Hege (2020). Prosjekt delingsøkonomi.
• Winther, Tanja (2020). Innspill til nytt Olje for utvikling, Norad.
• Szulecki, Kacper & Sutowski, Michal (2020). PIS NIE JEST TU GORSZY OD PO: POLITYCY WCIĄŻ WIERZĄ, ŻE ZMIANA KLIMATU NIE DOTYCZY POLSKI. [Internet]. Krytyka Polityczna. Show summary

  – Dziś w rządzie PiS usłyszymy głosy, które byłyby nie do pomyślenia w rządzie Ewy Kopacz. Z drugiej strony wciąż brakuje strategii, dwie frakcje w ramach Zjednoczonej Prawicy, gowinowcy i ziobryści, ciągną kwestię klimatu w dwie zupełnie przeciwne strony – Michał Sutowski rozmawia z Kacprem Szuleckim z Uniwersytetu w Oslo.

• Szulecki, Kacper & Øverland, Indra (2020). Energy Democracy and its Limits.
• Huber, Robert; Cetkovic, Stefan; Maltby, Tomas & Szulecki, Kacper (2020). Is Populism a Challenge to European Energy and Climate Policy? Unpacking the Causal Links and Empirical Evidence.
• Westskog, Hege (2020). Omstilling til lavutslippssamfunnet - hva og hvordan. .
• Westskog, Hege (2020). Vi må dele enda mer. Kommunal rapport. ISSN 0801-6410.
• Westskog, Hege (2020). Omstilling må være rettferdig. Kommunal rapport. ISSN 0801-6410.
• Hultgreen, Liv Randi; Kallbekken, Steffen; Marstein, Erik Stensrud; Tomasgard, Asgeir & Winther, Tanja (2020). Krisepakker som forsterker krisen. Forskning.no. ISSN 1891-635X.
• Szulecki, Kacper (2020). Do we need to phase out economic growth?
• Szulecki, Kacper (2020). Making Just Transitions Possible: It's identity, stupid!
• Hansen, Arve (2020). Intervju på NRK Radio om forbruksbaserte klimamålingar.
• Böcker, Lars & Røe, Per Gunnar (2020). Inclusive Urban Epidemic Resilience: Investigating and Mitigating uneven COVID-19 Impacts on Mobility, Health and Wellbeing.
• Lindberg, Marie Byskov (2020). Market design as enabler of sustainability transitions? A comparison of the German and the Nordic electricity market .
• Westskog, Hege (2020). Omstilling til lavutslippssamfunnet. Hva, hvem og hvordan? .
• Westskog, Hege (2020). Kortreiste kretsløp - bakgrunn og muligheter. .
• Westskog, Hege (2020). Kommunen som endringsaktør i klimaarbeidet. .
• Westskog, Hege (2020). Kortreist Kvalitet - et rammeverk for bærekraftig omstilling. .
• Szulecki, Kacper (2020). The Spaces for Freedom: Pandemic, the Climate Crisis and a Green Liberalism for the 21st century.
• Lindberg, Marie Byskov (2020). EUs klimapolitikk: Interne dragkamper og internasjonal posisjonering .
• Lindberg, Marie Byskov & Eikeland, Per Ove (2020). System costs or subsidy costs? Market design effects in advanced energy transitions .
• Lindberg, Marie Byskov (2020). Northconnect-regningen kan halveres. [Newspaper]. Dagens Næringsliv.
• Tønnesen, Anders (2020). Nullvekstmål og byvekstavtaler i det grønne skiftet.
• Foss, Lene (2020). KAPPASEMINAR.
• Foss, Lene (2020). Relevance of the PhD project- responsibility and stakeholders .
• Tønnesen, Anders (2020). Sosial rettferdighet i det grønne skiftet . Show summary

  En av totalt fire bidrag/ innlegg jeg hadde på KLP sin serie med klimakonferanser

• Sæle, Hanne & Aasen, Marianne (2020). "Foreløpige resultater fra spørreundersøkelse blant norske husholdninger: oppfatninger og holdninger til ny nettleie".
• Tønnesen, Anders (2020). Hvordan skape aksept for omstillingstiltak som berører flere styringsnivåer? .
• Tønnesen, Anders (2020). Transport and public planning in the Norwegian context.
• Foss, Lene & Solnørdal, Mette Talseth (2020). Include .
• Winther, Tanja (2020). Bruk av solpaneler i Norge - resultater fra forskningen . [Internet]. Solenergiklyngens Podcast.
• Foss, Lene & Solnørdal, Mette Talseth (2020). Masteroppgave med FME Include.
• Winther, Tanja (2020). Kan koronapandemien gjøre energibruken vår mer bærekraftig? [Internet]. SUMs Pandemipodcast - episode 14.
• Holsten, Hilde; Jackson Inderberg, Tor Håkon; Westskog, Hege & Winther, Tanja (2020). Hvem skaffer seg solcellepanel hjemme? [Journal]. Forskning.no. Show summary

  Plusskunder er betegnelsen som brukes på dem som har et anlegg ved boligen sin som produserer strøm. Som oftest dreier det seg om solcelleanlegg. I enkelte perioder produserer gjerne anlegget mer strøm enn kunden klarer å forbruke selv. De kan dermed selge strøm tilbake på nettet. Forskerne har undersøkt forholdene i markedet for plusskunder. De har analysert faktorer som hindrer eller fremmer at flere produserer strøm til eget forbruk i Norge. Ifølge forskerne er det særlig to ting som kjennetegner de som tidlig ble plusskunder: De er opptatt av miljø og er gode på teknologi.

• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2020). Intervju om koronakrisen og EUs klima- og energipolitikk. [Internet]. Energi og Klima.
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2020). EUs Green Deal. [Internet]. Magasinet Klima.
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2020). EUs Green Deal og havvind.
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2020). Innspill/bidrag til DNV-GLs 2030 Energy Outlook.
• Szulecki, Kacper (2020). The Chernobyl Effect - Anti-nuclear Protest and the Forging of Poland's Democracy 1986-1990.
• Szulecki, Kacper (2020). The Chernobyl Effect: Anti-nuclear Protest and the Forging of Poland's Democracy .
• Szulecki, Kacper (2020). Just transition in the Upper Silesia coal region.
• Winther, Tanja (2020). Equitable energy transition.
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2020). Intervju om utslipp og opptak i EUs klimamål. [Internet]. Energi og Klima.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2020). Kommunene vil ha mer makt i vindkraftsaker. [Radio]. NRK Dagsnytt 18.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2020). Fare for at kommuner ofrer naturverdier. Kommunal rapport. ISSN 0801-6410.
• Gulbrandsen, Lars Harald (2020). Kommunal vetorett er ingen miljøgaranti i vindkraftsaker. Dagens næringsliv. ISSN 0803-9372.
• Szulecki, Kacper (2020). Conspiracy theories and the energy transition: Russian oil conspiracies, the blackout myth, and Governance through fear.
• Jordhus-Lier, David Christoffer & Angell, Frida Hambro (2020). Fagbevegelsen og klimakamp: Hvilken rolle spiller fagbevegelsens og de tillitsvalgte?
• Standal, Karina (2020). Strømforbruket vårt er viktig i det grønne skifte. KLIMA - Et magasin om klimaforskning fra CICERO. Show summary

  Veien mot lavutslippssamfunnet krever endring blant både politikere, næringsliv og forbrukere. Et slikt skifte innebærer at vi også passer på strømforbruket innenfor husets fire vegger. Forskning viser imidlertid at det kan være vanskelig for familier og enkeltpersoner å kutte i strømforbruket. Endring av vaner krever mer enn bare informasjon, og for noen slår også tiltak på husholdningers strømforbruket uheldig ut. Akkurat den problemstillingen ser vi nærmere på i prosjektet Flexeffect – Fleksibel strømforbruk i husholdninger: Barrierer, muligheter og effekter.

• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2020). European Green Deal: Konsekvenser for klimapolitikken i EU og Norge.
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2020). European Green Deal: Konsekvenser for klimapolitikk og Parisavtalen.
• Tønnesen, Anders (2020). Nullvekstmål og byvekstavtaler som virkemidler i det grønne skiftet.
• Skjærseth, Jon Birger (2020). Future research priorities in EU climate and energy policies.
• Böcker, Lars; Wolday, Fitwi; Røe, Per Gunnar & Cottis Hoff, Sindre (2020). Korona og by og stedsutvikling.
• Jackson Inderberg, Tor Håkon (2019). The Institute Sector’s Research on Sustainability: Perspectives from The Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
• Hansen, Arve (2019). Berekraftig forbruk i byen: Byrom og kvardagskonsum.
• Jackson Inderberg, Tor Håkon (2019). FLEXEFFECT i FME INCLUDE - integrasjon og arbeidsdeling.
• Jackson Inderberg, Tor Håkon (2019). The Need for Justice Perspectives in the Norwegian Energy Transition.
• Hansen, Arve (2019). Panel participant during session "The role of energy and infrastructure in reaching social, environmental and economic Development".
• Holtsmark, Katinka Kristine; Böcker, Lars & Winther, Tanja (2019). Er bilkjøring en rettighet på lik linje med god helsehjelp? Dagens næringsliv. ISSN 0803-9372.
• Tønnesen, Anders (2019). Creating public acceptance for multilevel cooperation in green transitions.
• Böcker, Lars (2019). The dynamics of urban metabolism in the face of digitalisation and changing lifestyles.
• Westskog, Hege (2019). Multi-level governance of wicked problems - towards a flexible and co-managing practice.
• Szulecki, Kacper (2019). Participant in Roundtable: The role of energy and infrastructure in reaching social, environmental and economic development.
• Bridge, Gavin & Winther, Tanja (2019). Opening remarks: The role of energy and infrastructure in reaching social, environmental and economic development.
• abram, simone (2019). Decolonising Energy Transitions.
• Jenkins, Kirsten & Winther, Tanja (2019). Energy justice – promises and limitations of a novel concept.
• Standal, Karina (2019). Participation in RoundTable: The role of energy and infrastructure in reaching social, environmental and economic development.
• Westskog, Hege (2019). Omstilling til lavutslippssamfunnet – hvilken rolle kan kommunene spille?
• Szulecki, Kacper (2019). Participant in the panel "PROSUMERS: Challenges and opportunities in the energy transition".
• Røe, Per Gunnar (2019). Energy Spaces and Flows.
• West, Jennifer Joy; Amundsen, Helene; Schaller, Nathalie & Aasen, Marianne (2019). Addressing the existential threats of climate change.
• Stokstad, Sigrid (2019). Hva er kommunenes formelle ansvar for det grønne skiftet?
• Standal, Karina (2019). Andelslandbruk og bærekraftig deling.
• Letnes, Morten (2019). Trodde du Osloregionen har et godt kollektivtilbud? Bilen gir tre ganger bedre jobbmuligheter i 92 prosent av området. [Business/trade/industry journal]. Teknisk Ukeblad.
• Westskog, Hege & Amundsen, Helene (2019). Byvekstavtaler - muligheter og utfordringer.
• Tønnesen, Anders (2019). Byområdene i NTP og rammeverk for byvekstavtaler.
• Tønnesen, Anders (2019). Creating public acceptance for multilevel cooperation in green transitions Oslo and Gothenburg.
• Böcker, Lars; Holtsmark, Katinka Kristine & Winther, Tanja (2019). Bærekraftige bilavgifter 2025 – innspill fra enkeltforskere tilknyttet INCLUDE til Finansdepartementet.
• Winther, Tanja (2019). Establishing ‘INCLUDE’ as a transdisciplinary research centre on environmentally friendly energy in Norway: reflections on the process towards successful proposal – and some challenges ahead .
• Winther, Tanja (2019). Moderator during session "The role of energy and infrastructure in reaching social, environmental and economic Development".
• Winther, Tanja (2019). INCLUDE - INCLUsive Decarbonisation and Energy transition.
• Winther, Tanja (2019). Presentasjon av INCLUDE.
• Winther, Tanja (2019). INCLUDE - et nytt FME Samfunn: planer, mål og forskningen senteret bygger på .
• Böcker, Lars (2019). Byen, miljø og trivsel: Byen som metabolisme. Fortetting – bilfritt – trivelig?
• Holtsmark, Katinka Kristine; Böcker, Lars & Winther, Tanja (2019). Nei, vi har ikke glemt behovet for å kutte utslipp. Dagens næringsliv. ISSN 0803-9372.
• Aasen, Marianne; Klemetsen, Marit Elisabeth & Vatn, Arild (2022). Folk og klima: Utvikling i nordmenns oppfatninger om klimaendringer, klimapolitikk og eget ansvar 2018-2021 . CICERO Senter for klimaforskning. 2022(07). Show summary

  Denne rapporten gir en oversikt over noen deskriptive resultater fra fire spørreundersøkelser gjort i prosjektet ACT (‘From targets to action: public responses to climate policy instruments’) som er finansiert av Norges forskningsråd. Prosjektet ferdigstilles i løpet av 2022, mens CICEROs klimaundersøkelse fortsetter. Mange av spørsmålene i undersøkelsen presenteres ikke her, men vies grundigere analyser i publiserte og kommende vitenskapelige artikler. Tallene som presenteres i denne rapporten gir oss et bilde av hva nordmenn mener om klimaendringer, klimapolitikk og eget ansvar. Oppsummert viser tallene stor grad av stabilitet over tid, med noen unntak, og mønstrene i forskjeller mellom grupper er også relativt stabile.

• Torvanger, Asbjørn (2021). Forest-based bioenergy in Norway’s green transition: Balancing production and other societal interests. CICERO Senter for klimaforskning. 2021(09). Show summary

  This report explores the potential of bioenergy from forests to contribute to the green transition of society. Forest biomass is the largest potential bioenergy source in Norway, in the form of firewood, chips for heating, and biofuels. Firewood and chips for firing can be produced locally and small-scale, whereas biofuels must be produced at industrial and large scale - also implying more industrial logging practices. Bioenergy must compete with other societal needs, especially timber for buildings and fiber for industry, which have higher value. In addition, forests provide eco-services like nature protection for biodiversity, carbon storage as a climate measure, as well as an arena for outdoor activities. In this report I first examine available forest resources for bioenergy in Norway, then assess how bioenergy production can be balanced with nature protection and outdoor activities in Oslo and Viken county. This assessment is based on interviews with stakeholders from forest owners, industry, environmental organizations, and authorities. There are unused forest resources for bioenergy in Norway based on biomass with lowest quality. Increased biofuel production requires large investments in production facilities and depends on higher prices and more taxing of fossil fuels. Local logging and firewood production is easier to combine with nature protection and outdoor activities than industrial logging for biofuels, timber, or fiber production. Conflicts with other societal interests is reduced if more forest areas are protected, especially in the vicinity of cities, whereas other areas are open for logging.

• Solnørdal, Mette Talseth (2021). Firm internal drivers for eco-process innovation. A multi-method analysis of energy efficiency in Norwegian manufacturing firms. UiT Norges arktiske universitet. ISSN 978-82-8266-190-4.
• Bredvold, Torjus Lunder (2020). «Where No One is Poor, and Energy is Abundant»: A Study of Energy Poverty in Norwegian Households. Fridtjof Nansens Institutt. ISSN 978-82-7613-727-9. Show summary

  Almost 50 million EU citizens are affected by energy poverty, which is generally defined as inadequate use of domestic energy services. However, while extensive research has been conducted on the implications that some dimensions of energy poverty, such as high energy costs and cold homes have on households in the EU, very little is known about this in the context of Norway. Norway is one of the most income-equal countries in the world as well as a country with historically low electricity prices. Despite this however, if some Norwegian households continue to live in energy poverty, they may endure the double trauma of being energy poor while not being recognized as such. The aim of this qualitative study is to explore how Norwegian households experience, cope and make changes in response to energy poverty, from changing their use of energy services to maintaining social relations and a preferred lifestyle. The main research question guiding this report is: how do vulnerable households in Norway experience energy poverty in everyday life? The data material for the study was collected through semi-structured interviews conducted with 18 members from 17 households experiencing energy poverty. The interviewees were recruited using a variation of recruitment approaches, such as gatekeepers, snowballing and hand-picking cases. Findings are analyzed and discussed drawing on concepts from practice theory. The study finds that lack of financial independence, social capital in the form of family, social and material dimensions to housing and energy consumption as well as normative expectations of energy use have implications for how energy poverty is experienced by households. Most interviewees have little perceived agency to ameliorate their situation. A group of younger interviewees feel marginalized having to limit energy use extensively, cut food costs, rely on financial support from parents and isolate themselves to pay high energy costs in the colder months. They feel unable to live “normal” lives and struggle with feelings of shame, embarrassment, and stigma. A group of older interviewees are less vulnerable having more stable sources of income, drawing on cheap or free firewood as well as having stronger social capital in the form of their children. This group primarily struggles with maintaining an adequate indoor temperature and rarely mentions making sacrifices in other areas. Rather, these interviewees express having learned to live within the boundaries of their financial means and having found strength in careful management of their financial means.

View all works in Cristin