Why some municipalities accept windpower farms

Siting controversies have become familiar in windpower development. Researchers have examined why some Norwegian municipalities agree to host windpower. Three main factors stand out.

Image may contain: Wind turbine, Windmill, Wind farm, Wind, Turbine.

The property tax is the major justification for welcoming windpower projects. In this photo: Stamåsen Wind Farm, Photo by Statkraft

Economic compensation

"Revenues generated from windpower projects, the potential for new jobs and greater activity for local business and industry are all listed as important local benefit and are chief motivations for communities who says yes to windpower projects", says Include researcher Tor Håkon Jackson Inderberg, at the Fridtjof Nansen Institute.

Image may contain: Clothing, Chin, Forehead.
Tor Håkon Jackson Inderberg

He is one of three authors of the article called What shapes municipalities’ perceptions of  fairness in windpower developments? published in the journal "Local Environment".

When asked why they had agreed to host windpower facilities, all municipality representatives mentioned the property tax as the major justification for welcoming windpower projects. For one municipality with around 1000 inhabitants and several large windpower facilities, this meant the equivalent of about €2 million per year. 

Most of the municipality representatives highlighted the municipal role as service providers in education, health and infrastructure. The property tax made it easier for the representatives to provide good service in these sectors. 

"As one explained, tax revenues and the new business opportunities related to windpower development could serve as a way of trying to turn the trend of a declining population", says Inderberg.

A positive effect of new windpower projects on global environmental concerns has also been among the justifications for hosting windpower parks, although it has not been heavily emphasized. Also mentioned were the EU's Renewable Energy Directive and Norway's commitment to produce renewable energy, and that helping to combat climate change was also seen as positive for the municipalities’ reputation.

"That is not to say that they ignored the negative consequences of windpower development on nature and landscape. Such concerns are important for the municipalities, but other concerns are more important in the complex weighing of pros and cons, including weighing of different value-sets", elaborate Inderberg.

The negative consequences on local landscape and nature were considered “tolerable” when the economic compensation is “right”. The property tax as a form of local benefit seems to have had a strong effect in creating acceptability and perceived fairness for municipality hosting windpower plants.

Involvement in the process

Municipalities in this study were generally satisfied with their degree of involvement in the process. Several commended the work of the NVE in informing the local council and municipal administration about the licensing process, as well as the general public through open meetings.

"Real and meaningful inclusion in decision-making processes are recognised as important elements in local acceptance of windpower installations", says Inderberg.

Relative fairness and local expectations.

However, in retrospect, several municipalities were disappointed at the community benefits resulting from windpower development.

In some cases, the projects had not provided as many jobs as expected, and community benefits agreements with developers were altered or not adhered to, deepening the sense of disappointment.

The results did not correspond to what the municipalities had perceived and expected as a fair outcome: 

"Several interviewees mentioned the relative imbalance between compensation for windpower and for hydropower projects, where the latter had secured stable local incomes to a great degree – in contrast to windpower projects".

Image may contain: Wind farm, Wind turbine, Wind, Windmill, Sky.
Smøla Wind Farm Foto: Statkraft

Providing welfare - municipality's primary role

Municipalities must balance many complex interests. Although economic compensation used for welfare services cannot be said to compensate directly the damage to nature and the landscape, it is a way of supporting the municipality's primary roles.

"Nature protection is not seen as a key task of the municipalities in our study: far more dominant were their roles in welfare provision and in sustaining a stable local economy", says Inderberg. 

These findings from Norwegian municipalities underline that the economic compensation can directly match the interests of some local actors,

"Even if a landscape is highly valued, there is at the same time also a genuine economic interest in the development of the energy producing facilities. For the actor studied here, the municipality, has a role in securing a viable tax base as well as jobs and local economic development. Wind power development is seen as one way of securing this", underlines Inderberg. 

Published Apr. 29, 2020 9:17 AM - Last modified June 10, 2020 12:53 PM